Emerging auditory research Lab

Posters and Publications

​1–77​

Dr. Arenberg’s Publications

  1. 1.
    K Arjmandi M, S Herrmann B, Caswell-Midwinter B, M Doney E, G Arenberg J. [HTML] from nih.gov A modified pediatric ranked order speech perception score to assess speech recognition development in children with cochlear implants. American Journal of Audiology. 2022;31.
  2. 2.
    DeVries L, Scheperle R, Arenberg Bierer J. Assessing the electrode-neuron interface with the electrically evoked compound action potential, electrode position, and behavioral thresholds. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 2016;17:237-252.
  3. 3.
    Langner F, G Arenberg J, Büchner A, Nogueira W. Assessing the relationship between neural health measures and speech performance with simultaneous electric stimulation in cochlear implant listeners. Plos One. 2021;16.
  4. 4.
    C Middlebrooks J, Arenberg Bierer J. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2002;87:493-507.
  5. 5.
    Arenberg Bierer J, C Middlebrooks J. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2002;87:478-492.
  6. 6.
    N Jahn K, D Bergan M, G Arenberg J. Auditory detection thresholds and cochlear resistivity differ between pediatric cochlear implant listeners with enlarged vestibular aqueduct and those with connexin-26 mutations. American Journal of Audiology. 2020;29:23-34.
  7. 7.
    C Middlebrooks J, Arenberg Bierer J, L Snyder R. Cochlear implants: the view from the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2005;14:488-493.
  8. 8.
    A Kreft H, A DeVries L, G Arenberg J, J Oxenham A. Comparing rapid and traditional forward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear-implant users. Trends in Hearing. 2019;23.
  9. 9.
    Arenberg Bierer J, D Nye A. Comparisons between detection threshold and loudness perception for individual cochlear implant channels. Ear and Hearing. 2014;35.
  10. 10.
    P Carlyon R, Cosentino S, M Deeks J, Parkinson W, G Arenberg J. Correction to: Effect of stimulus polarity on detection thresholds in cochlear implant users: Relationships with average threshold, gap detection, and rate discrimination. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 2018;19.
  11. 11.
    Arenberg Bierer J, C Middlebrooks J. Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 2004;5:32-48.
  12. 12.
    DeVries L, G Arenberg J. Current focusing to reduce channel interaction for distant electrodes in cochlear implant programs. Trends in Hearing. 2018;22.
  13. 13.
    Arenberg K, Cabriac G, Marks S, G. Arenberg J, R. Pfeiffer P, S. Murray R. Cytomegalovirus Antibodies in Endolymphatic Sac Biopsies of Patients with Endolymphatic Hydrops and Mbnihre’s Disease. International Meniere’s Disease Research Institute. Published online December 1997.
  14. 14.
    Suresh K, Franck K, G Arenberg J, Song Y, J Lee D, G Crowson M. Development of a Predictive Model for Individualized Hearing Aid Benefit. Otology & Neurotology. 2023;44.
  15. 15.
    DiNino M, G Arenberg J, LR Duchen A, B Winn M. Effects of age and cochlear implantation on spectrally cued speech categorization. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2020;63:2425-2440.
  16. 16.
    J Bradford M, Castellanos de Muñoz P, Kover S, G Arenberg J, Tremblay K, Mancl L. Hospital-Based Newborn Hearing Screening Across The Globe: A Systematic Review & Preliminary Report On Guatemala’s Program. Published online 2019.
  17. 17.
    Arenberg Bierer J, F Faulkner K, L Tremblay K. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: Electrically-evoked auditory brainstem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration. Ear and Hearing. 2011;32.
  18. 18.
    Arenberg Bierer J, F Faulkner K. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves. Ear and Hearing. 2010;31.
  19. 19.
    N Jahn K, G Arenberg J. Identifying cochlear implant channels with relatively poor electrode-neuron interfaces using the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear and Hearing. 2020;41:961-973.
  20. 20.
    Konerding W, G Arenberg J, Kral A, Baumhoff P. Late electrically-evoked compound action potentials as markers for acute micro-lesions of spiral ganglion neurons. Hearing Research. 2022;413.
  21. 21.
    Carlyon R, S Consentino, Deeks J, W Parkinson, Bierer J. Limitations on temporal processing by cochlear implant users. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2016;139.
  22. 22.
    Arenberg J, Komjathy D, Seidman M, Quirk W. Local effects of nitric oxide on vestibular blood flow in the Mongolian gerbil. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology. 1997;254:367-371.
  23. 23.
    H Goldwyn J, M Bierer S, Arenberg Bierer J. Modeling the electrode–neuron interface of cochlear implants: Effects of neural survival, electrode placement, and the partial tripolar configuration. Hearing Research. 2010;268:93-104.
  24. 24.
    D Seidman M, G Arenberg J, A Shirwany N. Palatal myoclonus as a cause of objective tinnitus: a report of six cases and a review of the literature. Ear, Nose, and Throat Journal. 1999;78:292-297.
  25. 25.
    Arenberg Bierer J, M Bierer S, C Middlebrooks J. Partial tripolar cochlear implant stimulation: Spread of excitation and forward masking in the inferior colliculus. Hearing Research. 2010;270:134-142.
  26. 26.
    N Jahn K, G Arenberg J. Polarity sensitivity in pediatric and adult cochlear implant listeners. Trends in Hearing. 2019;23.
  27. 27.
    G Arenberg J, H Hull R, Hunter L. Postgraduate Specialization Fellowship Training for Audiologists: Survey Results From Educators, Supervisors, and Students. American Journal of Audiology. 2020;29.
  28. 28.
    Zaar J, Schmitt N, Derleth RP, DiNino M, G Arenberg J, Dau T. Predicting effects of hearing-instrument signal processing on consonant perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2017;142:3216-3226.
  29. 29.
    Arenberg Bierer J. Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation. Trends in Amplification. 2010;14:84-95.
  30. 30.
    DeVries L, A Bierer J. Psychophysical tuning curves as a measure of electrode position in cochlear implant listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2016;140.
  31. 31.
    N Jahn K, DeVries L, G Arenberg J. Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners: Effects of age and the electrode-neuron interface. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2021;149:1633-16433.
  32. 32.
    A Bierer J, Litvak L. Reducing channel interaction through cochlear implant programming may improve speech perception: Current focusing and channel deactivation. Trends in Hearing. 2016;20.
  33. 33.
    K Arjmandi M, N Jahn K, G Arenberg J. Single-channel focused thresholds relate to vowel identification in pediatric and adult cochlear implant listeners. Trends in Hearing. 2022;26.
  34. 34.
    N Jahn K, DiNino M, G Arenberg J. Reducing simulated channel interaction reveals differences in phoneme identification between children and adults with normal hearing. Ear and Hearing. 2019;40.
  35. 35.
    N Jahn K, G Arenberg J, L Horn D. Spectral resolution development in children with normal hearing and with cochlear implants: A review of behavioral studies. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2022;65.
  36. 36.
    Goehring T, W Archer-Boyd A, G Arenberg J, P Carlyon R. The effect of increased channel interaction on speech perception with cochlear implants. Scientific Reports. 2021;11.
  37. 37.
    G Arenberg J, A DeVries L. The effects of auditory experience on psychophysical tuning curves in pediatric and adult cochlear implant listeners. Acta Acustica united with Acustica. 2018;104:830-834.
  38. 38.
    Caswell-Midwinter B, M Doney E, K Arjmandi M, N Jahn K, S Herrmann B, G Arenberg J. The relationship between impedance, programming and word recognition in a large clinical dataset of cochlear implant recipients. Trends in Hearing. 2022;26.
  39. 39.
    Arenberg Bierer J. Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2007;121:1642-1653.
  40. 40.
    L Snyder R, A Bierer J, C Middlebrooks J. Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 2004;5:305-322.
  41. 41.
    Goehring T, G Arenberg J, P Carlyon R. Using spectral blurring to assess effects of channel interaction on speech-in-noise perception with cochlear implants. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 2020;21:353-371.
  42. 42.
    I McHugh C, K Swedenborg B, X Chen J, et al. Voluntary Field Recall of Advanced Bionics HiRes Cochlear Implants: A Single-Institution Experience. Otology & Neurotology. 2022;43.
  43. 43.
    N Jahn K, DiNino M, Winn M, Hulswit J, G Arenberg J. Vowel confusion patterns in children and adults with cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2018;144.
  44. 44.
    K. Arjmandi M, S. Herrmann B, Caswell-Midwinter B, M. Doney E, G. Arenberg J. A Modified Pediatric Ranked Order Speech Perception Score to Assess Speech Recognition Development in Children With Cochlear Implants. American Journal of Audiology. 2022;31:613-632. doi:10.1044/2022_AJA-21-00212
  45. 45.
    Langner F, G. Arenberg J, Büchner A, Nogueira W. Assessing the relationship between neural health measures and speech performance with simultaneous electric stimulation in cochlear implant listeners. PLOS ONE. 2021;16:e0261295. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261295
  46. 46.
    G. Arenberg J, Furukawa S, C. Middlebrooks J. Auditory Cortical Images of Tones and Noise Bands. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 2000;1:183-194. doi:10.1007/s101620010036
  47. 47.
    Arenberg Bierer J, M. Bierer S, S. Maloff E, Lin A. Cochlear implant channels with high thresholds degrade medial vowel perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2011;129:2656-2656. doi:10.1121/1.3588867
  48. 48.
    DiNino M, B. Winn M, A. Bierer J. Cochlear implant listener vowel identification performance and confusion patterns with selective channel activation programs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2016;140:3438-3438. doi:10.1121/1.4971082
  49. 49.
    Caswell-Midwinter B, G. Arenberg J. Comparing Fixed and Individualized Channel Interaction Coefficients for Speech Perception With Dynamic Focusing Cochlear Implant Strategies. Trends in Hearing. 2023;27:233121652311761. doi:10.1177/23312165231176157
  50. 50.
    A. Kreft H, A. DeVries L, G. Arenberg J, J. Oxenham A. Comparing Rapid and Traditional Forward-Masked Spatial Tuning Curves in Cochlear-Implant Users. Trends in Hearing. 2019;23:233121651985130. doi:10.1177/2331216519851306
  51. 51.
    O’Brien G, DiNino M, J. D. Biesheuvel, J. Briaire J, H. Frijns J, A. Bierer J. Comparing auditory perceptual thresholds in pediatric and adult cochlear implant populations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2016;140:3157-3157. doi:10.1121/1.4969908
  52. 52.
    G. Arenberg J, N. Jahn K, A. Devries L, DiNino M. Consequences of auditory experience and cochlear implant stimulation on tuning and other measures obtained in pre-lingually deaf children and postlingually deaf adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2019;145:1905-1905. doi:10.1121/1.5101910
  53. 53.
    P. Carlyon R, Cosentino S, M. Deeks J, Parkinson W, G. Arenberg J. Correction to: Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Detection Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Users: Relationships with Average Threshold, Gap Detection, and Rate Discrimination. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 2018;19:569-569. doi:10.1007/s10162-018-00695-y
  54. 54.
    Suresh K, Franck K, G. Arenberg J, Song Y, J. Lee D, G. Crowson M. Development of a Predictive Model for Individualized Hearing Aid Benefit. Otology & Neurotology. 2023;44:e1-e7. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000003739
  55. 55.
    Cosentino S, De Vries L, Scheperle R, Bierer J, Carlyon R. Dual-stage algorithm to identify channels with poor electrode-to-neuron interface in cochlear implant users. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE; 2016:834-838. doi:10.1109/ICASSP.2016.7471792
  56. 56.
    DiNino M, G. Arenberg J, L. R. Duchen A, B. Winn M. Effects of Age and Cochlear Implantation on Spectrally Cued Speech Categorization. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2020;63:2425-2440. doi:10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00127
  57. 57.
    J Bradford M, Castellanos de Muñoz P, Kover S, G. Arenberg J, Tremblay K, Manel L. Hospital-Based Newborn Hearing Screening across the Globe: A Systematic Review & Preliminary Report on Guatemala’s Program. Published online May 2019. https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/bitstream/handle/1773/43783/Bradford%20Capstone%20Paper.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  58. 58.
    Garcia A, Haleem A, A. Chari D, Morse-Fortier C, G. Arenberg J, J. Lee D. Influence of listening environment on usage patterns in cochlear implant patients with single-sided deafness. Cochlear Implants International. Published online February 2023:1-7. doi:10.1080/14670100.2023.2176990
  59. 59.
    Konerding W, G. Arenberg J, Kral A, Baumhoff P. Late electrically-evoked compound action potentials as markers for acute micro-lesions of spiral ganglion neurons. Hearing Research. 2022;413:108057. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2020.108057
  60. 60.
    P. Carlyon R, Cosentino S, M. Deeks J, Parkinson W, A. Bierer J. Limitations on temporal processing by cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2016;139:2154-2154. doi:10.1121/1.4950373
  61. 61.
    Arenberg J. Patterns of auditory cortical activation elicited by stimulation of a cochlear prosthesis. University of Michigan ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Published online 2001. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/41376
  62. 62.
    N. Jahn K, G. Arenberg J. Polarity Sensitivity in Pediatric and Adult Cochlear Implant Listeners. Trends in Hearing. 2019;23:233121651986298. doi:10.1177/2331216519862987
  63. 63.
    G. Arenberg J, H. Hull R, Hunter L. Postgraduate Specialization Fellowship Training for Audiologists: Survey Results From Educators, Supervisors, and Students. American Journal of Audiology. 2020;29:290-299. doi:10.1044/2019_AJA-19-00059
  64. 64.
    Zaar J, Schmitt N, Derleth RP, DiNino M, G. Arenberg J, Dau T. Predicting effects of hearing-instrument signal processing on consonant perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2017;142:3216-3226. doi:10.1121/1.5011737
  65. 65.
    J. Thomas Roland, Buchman C, Eisenberg L, et al. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium of the American Cochlear Implant Alliance ¡sup¿†¡/sup¿. Cochlear Implants International. 2016;17:211-237. doi:10.1080/14670100.2016.1225348
  66. 66.
    N. Jahn K, Morse-Fortier C, M. Griffin A, et al. Programming Levels and Speech Perception in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients With Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct or GJB2 Mutation. Otology & Neurotology. 2023;44:e273-e280. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000003879
  67. 67.
    DeVries L, G Arenberg J. Psychophysical tuning curves as a correlate of electrode position in cochlear implant listeners. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 2018;19:571-587.
  68. 68.
    DeVries L, A. Bierer J. Psychophysical tuning curves as a measure of electrode position in cochlear implant listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2016;140:3157-3157. doi:10.1121/1.4969910
  69. 69.
    N. Jahn K, DeVries L, G. Arenberg J. Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners: Effects of age and the electrode-neuron interface. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2021;149:1633-1643. doi:10.1121/10.0003623
  70. 70.
    D Backous, E Elkins, J Hillyer, et al. Relationships between cognitive measures, speech understanding and cochlear implant benefit in high-performing cochlear implant users…15th International conferences on Cochlear Implants, 27-30 June 2018, Antwerp, Belgium. Journal of Hearing Science. 2018;8. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=131275269&site=ehost-live
  71. 71.
    K. Arjmandi M, N. Jahn K, G. Arenberg J. Single-Channel Focused Thresholds Relate to Vowel Identification in Pediatric and Adult Cochlear Implant Listeners. Trends in Hearing. 2022;26:233121652210953. doi:10.1177/23312165221095364
  72. 72.
    Goehring T, G. Arenberg J, P Carlyon R. Spectral Blurring in Cochlear Implants: Association with Channel Interaction and Effects on Speech-in-Noise Perception. Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Acoustics. Published online September 2019:2227-2234. https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/api/core/bitstreams/643f6b7a-fe9d-4797-af3a-21a96a94cf48/content
  73. 73.
    N. Jahn K, G. Arenberg J, L. Horn D. Spectral Resolution Development in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants: A Review of Behavioral Studies. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2022;65:1646-1658. doi:10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00307
  74. 74.
    G. Arenberg J, A. DeVries L. The Effects of Auditory Experience on Psychophysical Tuning Curves in Pediatric and Adult Cochlear Implant Listeners. Acta Acustica united with Acustica. 2018;104:830-834. doi:10.3813/AAA.919255
  75. 75.
    I. McHugh C, K. Swedenborg B, X. Chen J, et al. Voluntary Field Recall of Advanced Bionics HiRes Cochlear Implants: A Single-Institution Experience. Otology & Neurotology. 2022;43:e1094-e1099. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000003711
  76. 76.
    N. Jahn K, DiNino M, Winn M, Hulswit J, G. Arenberg J. Vowel confusion patterns in children and adults with cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2018;144:1794-1794. doi:10.1121/1.5067915
  77. 77.
    A. Bierer J, DiNino M. Within-listener comparisons of vowel confusions in pediatric, bilateral cochlear implantees. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2016;140:3438-3438. doi:10.1121/1.4971081